To advance ethical and scientific rigor in research and evidence generation for governance, policy and practice in human rights action, humanitarian response, health, education, heritage stewardship, and sustainable development.
 
iStock_82958543_XLARGE_Typography.png
 

PURPOSE STATEMENT at founding [2016]

To advance scientific rigor, ethical resilience and integrity in research and evidence generation across the sciences and humanities...informing human rights action, humanitarian response, health, education, heritage stewardship, development, climate and peace…strengthening governance, policy and practice by governments, international agencies, INGOs, civil society organizations (CSOs), commercial entities, and individuals.

Nepal. Empowerment of women and girls is perhaps the single, most powerful strategy t0 drive achievement of the SDGs/Agenda 2030. But there is still much work ahead to develop and articulate the evidence informing effective and sustainable empowerme…

Nepal. Empowerment of women and girls is perhaps the single, most powerful strategy t0 drive achievement of the SDGs/Agenda 2030. But there is still much work ahead to develop and articulate the evidence informing effective and sustainable empowerment. [Photo credit: David R Curry]

 

GE2P2 GloBal Foundation :: PURPOSE/POSTURE [2025]


 

Our purpose is to advance scientific rigor, ethical resilience, and integrity in research and evidence generation.

:: We engage our purpose across the sciences and the humanities, and across sectors including health, human rights, humanitarian action, education and literacy, heritage stewardship, development, climate, peace.

:: We recognize an imperative to foster and defend key conditions necessary for responsible science to thrive. These conditions include unchallenged freedom of expression and inquiry, freedom from corrosive political interference and ideology, broad science literacy and effective public accountability, requisite funding and resources, effective oversight via robust ethical and regulatory review, comprehensive results transparency, and fit-for-purpose peer review.

:: Equally, we recognize an imperative to foster and defend the larger conditions in which responsible science operates. These conditions include respect for fundamental human rights and freedoms including “the right to science” and its benefits, properly functioning multilateral institutions, adherence to treaties, conventions and the rule of law, and vibrant, evolving democratic institutions.

:: In the face of growing challenges and specific threats to science and these enabling conditions and contexts, we remain steadfast in our purpose and in our embrace of these imperatives.

Our posture is anchored on direct, substantive interventions – melding intellectual precision, imagination, transdisciplinary perspectives, diverse knowledge traditions, and transcultural collaboration.

:: We publish six digests curating new research, evidence, analysis and strategic developments across our trans-sectoral range.

:: We map and analyze the global ecology of ethical norms and regulations guiding responsible research, assess long-horizon priorities and strategies for the stewardship of science, and propose directions forward.

:: We respond to calls for public consultation and make other contributions in developing and implementing standards, policies, guidance, laws, and regulations. These calls are generated by UN system agencies, multilateral organizations, INGOs, academic institutions, governments and commercial organizations.

:: We provide direct advisory support to selected global organizations facing complex, real-world challenges and deliver medically-responsible, operationally-sound, and ethically-resilient solutions.

:: We leverage the analysis, insights and solutions generated in these interventions to inform and exercise our voice in public discourse, in the academic literature, and, when required, in asymmetric action.

:: We engage these interventions and exercise our voice as a matter of transnational civic responsibility intended to contribute to global public good.

We act through our community of practice operating in more than 30 countries.

:: Our members are elected by the GE2P2 Global Foundation’s Board of Directors and include scientists, researchers, clinicians, ethicists, independent scholars from across academic disciplines, and leaders from across sectors. We employ thematic centers of excellence and host the Global Forum for Research Ethics and Integrity [GFREI] to help organize our collaborative energies.

We operate as an NGO/nonprofit organization [501(c)3] and affiliated public benefit corporation.

:: The GE2P2 Global Foundation was founded in 2016 as a non-profit [501(c)3] spin-off from the NYU School of Medicine’s Division of Medical Ethics. GE2P2 Global Advisory Services pbc [public benefit corporation] was formed in 2017 as an affiliate of the Foundation to provide advisory services to selected multilateral, public sector, academic, NGO, and commercial organizations.

 
Haiti. Smallholder farmers are at the center of value chains which ensure food security, economic development, and poverty reduction. [Photo credit: David R Curry]

Haiti. Smallholder farmers are at the center of value chains which ensure food security, economic development, and poverty reduction. [Photo credit: David R Curry]

 

Centers & Programs

The Foundation operates through a portfolio of Centers AND PROGRAMS described below. we invite you To support our work,


03: GE2P2

CENTER FOR VACCINE ETHICS AND POLICY (CVEP)

Founded as the Ethics of Vaccine Project in 2006, CVEP engages the full life-cycle of issues around global immunization and vaccines:

  1.  building and refining the ethical frameworks that help assure that policy proceeds from values and aligns with their implications,

  2.  analyzing and communicating about vaccine evidence, ethics and policy in scholarly journals, the media and in other fora,

  3.  innovating new analytical, visualization and decision approaches to address these issues, and

  4. convening the full vaccine community to consider evidence, ethics and practical solutions, addressing opportunity and performance.

  5. CVEP also offers a knowledge-sharing service through publication of Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review. 

This comprehensive weekly digest aggregates news, events, announcements, peer-reviewed articles and research in the global vaccine ethics and policy space. Content is selected from key governmental, NGO, international organization and industry sources, key peer-reviewed journals, and other media channels.

This Week in Review now reaches over 2,500 leaders in the vaccine space globally each week through direct email distribution. These leaders operate in diverse spheres including government, the NGO/ONG community, UN agencies and other intergovernmental bodies, think tanks and policy organisations, academia, philanthropy, and industry. 

Our continuing intent is to support broad literacy and current awareness at the leadership level across the global vaccine community. Specifically, we believe that this digest – delivered each weekend – supports stronger, evidence-based policy analysis and decision-making, enhances research strategy, and functions as a productivity tool for leaders whose time to devote to reading broadly is limited. 

If you would like to learn more about the work of CVEP,  please click here. If you would like to support the work of the Center for Vaccine Ethics and Policy, click here. If you like to support for our weekly digest -- Vaccines and Global Health: The Week in Review -- click here.

Center for Informed Consent Integrity

 The Center for Informed Consent Integrity will address informed consent broadly and holds that “consent” – grounded in open, evidence-based, accessible, understandable and materially-complete information – is the bulwark of human rights, fundamental freedoms, and responsible governance.

 The Center will focus on consent in research contexts across all the Foundation’s action sectors including health, human rights, humanitarian response, education and literacy, sustainable development, and heritage stewardship.

 This work includes producing knowledge sharing services Informed Consent :: A Monthly Review which  aggregates and distills key literature and analysis around IC including governance, ethics review and oversight, content approaches, technology and assessment strategies/performance metrics.

More information here: https://ge2p2global-centerforinformedconsentintegrity.org/

Center for Genomic Medicine Ethics and Policy (CGMEP)

Genomics – spanning discovery, preclinical, clinical and translation to daily patient interventions – continues to evolve at an extraordinary pace. Advances in the scientific and technical dimensions of genomics overall are extensively communicated through the peer-reviewed journal literature and supporting grey literature.

The GE2P2 Global Foundation’s Center for Genomic Medicine Governance, Ethics & Policy will focus on this rapidly evolving field primarily on the important ecology comprising governance, ethics and policy, and less.about tools and techniques [CRISPR advances, for example].

One key departure point for our work is the important set of reports issues in July 2021 by the WHO Expert Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing, in particular Human genome editing: a framework for governance [12 July 2021].

We have launched a literature digest to support our work ahead which is available on this site and by direct subscription. We will proceed with joint projects involving our Center for Informed Consent Integrity such as our IC for Genomic Medicine initiative, and actively explore collaborations with other organizations and initiatives.

More information here: https://ge2p2global-centergenomicmedicinegovernance.org/about/

GE2P2 Global – Independent Bioethics Advisory Committee [IBAC]

 IBAC is a capability hosted by the GE2P2 Global Foundation which provides research, analysis and advisory recommendations on issues which may arise across the life cycle of research and evidence generation, including how it informs operational integrity in governance, policy and program activity.

 Specifically, IBAC is evolving to engage such issues across our stated areas of focus – health, humanitarian response, human rights, sustainable development, education, and heritage stewardship.

 IBAC’s work is most mature in the health sphere, engaging issues across the full clinical development life cycle for medicines, vaccines, gene therapies and other health interventions. This life cycle approach includes clinical trial protocol development and implementation, compassionate use/expanded access, market introduction and licensing, deployment and access in humanitarian and low-resource contexts, and more.

 IBAC conducts its work by convening teams from the Foundation’s community of practice that are well-aligned to the issue/case/challenge engaged. For example, an IBAC team for an issue in the health sphere will typically include bioethicists, clinicians, HCPs, patient advocates and other domain knowledge experts appropriate to the problem at hand.

 IBAC’s analyses and recommendations are developed as independent work products, which, in turn, provide the basis for papers, presentations and other ways of generalizing the learnings from this advisory work.

 NEW AT OCTOBER 2021: IBAC will consider requests from non-commercial organizations and projects globally under which it will provide its bioethics advisory capability to respond to specific challenges where we can make a material contribution. Such engagements are limited by IBAC capacity at any given time, and will be provided without fee/pro bono. To explore whether this capability might align with your challenge, or for more information about IBAC overall, please contact David Curry, Foundation President, at david.r.curry@ge2p2global.org

 
Collaboration among international agencies, INGOs. civil society organizations, donors, country leadership and, not least, the communities and people themselves, requires continuing research to assure coherence, efficacy, equity and ethical resilien…

Collaboration among international agencies, INGOs. civil society organizations, donors, country leadership and, not least, the communities and people themselves, requires continuing research to assure coherence, efficacy, equity and ethical resilience.


 

FELLOWS of the Foundation

To address our purpose and mission, the Foundation engages the competencies, experience, and insights of a global network of elected “Fellows" of the Foundation.

 

 
 

To engage its purpose/mission, the Foundation draws on the competencies, experience, and insights of a global network of “Fellows" of the Foundation who contribute to strategy, research, governance and programs.

Fellows will include academic, agency and government leaders, field practitioners, scientists, researchers, ethicists, domain and cultural context experts, scholars in the social and bio sciences and the humanities, knowledge management experts, and many others. Fellows  may be independent or be functioning in government, academic, agency, NGO, or commercial contexts.

 Fellows and Associates are elected for one-year terms and such terms may be extended by the Board at its discretion.

 All Fellows and Associates participate under the leadership and direction of the President, contribute to governance by providing guidance on strategic direction as facilitated by the board, and are selectively convened as team members around specific research, projects and consultative work.

 Fellows and Associates are recognized on the Foundation website and convene from time-to-time and at least annually via electronic or physical meetings for knowledge sharing, to review strategy, and to affirm member guidance to the Board.

 The Board is considering a membership class for organizations – providing NGOs, CSOs, international agencies and commercial organizations with a means to support and participate in the Foundation. Such organization members would have a designated individual as their official, voting representative. More on this soon...

 

 
 
 
 
 

GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP

The Foundation is governed by a Board of Directors. The composition of the Board strives to represent a broad range of disciplines and research agendas across human rights, humanitarian response, health, heritage stewardship, education and development, and across major geographies and organization types.


 

FINANCIALS & REPORTING

We will post our annual reports, financial statements and other content supporting our commitment to full transparency.

GE2P2 Global Foundation 990 - 2019

GE2P2 Global Foundation 990 - 2018

GE2P2 Global Foundation 990 - 2017

 
Senegal. Young people should have every confidence that "programs" and "initiatives" intended to support their healthy growth anddevelopment are based on evidence which measures efficacy, and assures equity and ethical resilience. [Photo credit: Dav…

Senegal. Young people should have every confidence that "programs" and "initiatives" intended to support their healthy growth anddevelopment are based on evidence which measures efficacy, and assures equity and ethical resilience. [Photo credit: David Curry]

 

Statement of Independence

 

January 2022 | The GE2P2 Global Foundation, its programs and operating units are focused on advancing ethical and scientific rigor in research and evidence generation to inform governance, policy and practice in human rights, humanitarian response, health, education, heritage stewardship, and sustainable development.

We are open to collaboration, affiliation and alignments with academic, agency, NGO, CSO and other organizations as may further the purpose of the Foundation, and clearly communicate about such affiliations 

Our work depends on in-kind and financial support from a range of sources, including foundations, NGOs, academic institutions, governmental bodies, international agencies, commercial organizations, and individual donors.

We strive to balance and diversify the sources of support we accept in pursuing project work, publishing, convening symposiums and meetings, and conducting research.

We are committed to transparency in acknowledging the sources of support for work we undertake.

Regardless of the source, form or scale of support we receive, we do not accept and will not operate under any conditions which interfere with our independence in electing, designing or conducting our work, or in publishing and disseminating our findings.

We are particularly mindful of actual and potential conflicts of interest which may affect the ability of anyone associated with the foundation to participate in specific work. 

We will uniformly communicate any and all conflicts we identify to assure that all work products are transparent on this as well sources of support to assure maximum transparency.